12/26/2023 0 Comments Qupzilla extensions![]() You do lose Firefox's add-on compatibility, and, despite its name, the project has nothing to do with Mozilla, but I'm happy with that compromise for 99 percent of my browsing needs, especially on older hardware. A non-scientific test showed that it took almost half of Firefox's 840MB of RAM when showing the same number of tabs with the same content, for example, and its rendering and page loading feels equally snappy. Despite offering nearly every option you could need for a browser, it still feels much lighter on your system. Version 2.0 was updated to use Qt5 rather than Qt4, not only bringing much better web compatibility and rendering speed, but also all the many major improvements that have been made to Qt5 over the years. Quick may even be QupZilla's best feature. I even appreciate the way the developer has defaulted to Duck Duck Go by default and the inclusion of a speed dial for quick web access. Although I don't want to emphasize this feature, it also includes Flash support for those vestiges of the Internet that still need this ancient artifact. ![]() Extensions include the wonderful Greasemonkey, KWallet, mouse gestures, and Flash cookie management. There is a very capable bookmarks manager, an overly comprehensive preferences pane, a full history overview, and even built-in adblock. This is particularly important for KDE users, because there's not a particularly strong Qt-based browser that can compete with the GTK-based Firefox. It adopts themes and icons and provides native notification, helping it to feel just like a Gnome, KDE, or Xfce desktop application. What I really like about QupZilla is that it integrates so well with your chosen desktop, whatever that may be. The only hitch with Qutebrowser is that the switch to the superior QtWebEngine rendering engine is still in development – Qutebrowser's lead developer has just started a Computer Science course at the University of Applied Sciences in Rapperswil, Switzerland, which means that until the release of Qutebrowser 1.0, we're still looking for the perfect QtWebEngine browser. My current favorite is Qutebrowser, because navigating the web with Vim shortcuts is both addictive and productive. Chromium, for example, is a legitimate open source version of Google's Chrome, even when Google's motivations toward the web are uncertain, and I'm happy to see Gnome's Epiphany is now being actively developed again. That was an oversight on my behalf.Mozilla Firefox does a wonderful job, and it's a fundamental part of the future of the open web, but that doesn't mean you can't look at alternatives. Why don't you use IE5.5SP2 but IE5.5SP1 ?Īpologies - I actually do use IE 5.5-SP2. 2013) is more secure than Firefox 12.0 (Apr. Although I assume you need some sort of Kernel Extension application, the Windows 2K equivalent of "KernelX"?įirefox 12 and IE5.5 SP1 work just fine for me :-) To be honest, I hadn't considered that, and I didn't realise they actually worked. At this point in time, FF3.65.28 is automatically downloading FF12, the last for Windows 2K - so I'm looking forward to slightly better website display - but there is a speed reduction, I imagine. It is also a heck of a lot faster than the newer versions of IE, though Firefox on this machine is a tad sluggish. IE 5.5 SP1 also works surprisingly well for its age, and can display most websites fairly well still. Personally, I've found that Firefox 3.6.28 works and is still very usable on all sites - I was even using this on my school computer until a user-privileges error led to the re-installation of Windows XP Pro (Firefox was apparently only "interim" before they made the upgrade in 2012 to IE8 or IE9. In case of my main PC with 8GB of RAM I can install a dozen of different extensions, browse tens of websites at the same time and still have a lot of RAM left but on the laptop the only extension installed is AdBlock. What helps is to keep only 1-3 tabs open at once and not install extensions which also tend to use a lot of memory. The real problem is that the so called "modern" websites themselves use a lot of RAM and the browser can't really do a lot to help in this matter. Even on such a machine they work pretty well and browsing is smooth. I've got an older laptop with Pentium III-M 933MHz / 640MB RAM and I use the newest versions of both Firefox and Chrome on it. All browsers based on Chromium have the Javascript bug which (at least for me) makes them unusable in 2K. If you don't like it then Qupzilla (which you're already using) is fine. As long as it's not a very old computer I'd just use the newest versions of web browsers.įor Windows 2000 I recommend Firefox. You're probably going to encounter plenty of website incompatibility issues when using older browsers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |